Is The Silk’n Flash And Go Hair Removal System As Fast, Safe And Convenient As It Seems?
The Silk’n Flash and Go Hair Removal System is another in a long line of at-home laser treatments that hopes to replicate a professional experience and, even though the design of the device itself it not all that appealing, the declaration that it is clinically proven, fast and safe is enough to tempt women that are unable, or unwilling, to go elsewhere.
The simple light technology is said to be suitable for legs, arms, armpits and even facial hair but is this really the case? Does this Silk’n product offer the 90% hair reduction it promises?
Some Noted Features of the Silk’n Flash and Go Hair Removal System
- 90% hair reduction
- Long lasting hair removal device using light technology
- Suitable for armpit arms and face and legs
- Clinically proven and medically tested
- Fast, safe and easy to use
What advantages can the Silk’n Flash and Go system offer over other treatment options?
One of the main reasons that this product is so appealing to women is that it is meant to provide a convenient, cost effective method of hair removal compared to professional laser sessions or epilators.
User reviews for the Silk’n Flash and Go Hair Removal System appear to support this idea because women talk about the money they have saved and ease of use. The initial purchase and subsequent replacement heads have proved to be cheaper in the long run and the system is surprisingly easy to handle because of its shape and lightweight.
Another frequently mentioned benefit of this Silk’n hair removal system is the resulting hair reduction, with many users claiming a noticeable change in their appearance between a month and six weeks, and others have commented on a lack of in-growing hairs – something they have suffered with when using other forms of hair removal.
What flaws does the Silk’n Flash and Go system have that limit its potential?
As is to be expected with a product of such a personal nature, the feedback given by buyers varies in its enthusiasm because some will see minimal hair reductions and others focus on the negative aspects of the product design.
One area that generates some mixed response is the safety of the device and the chance of pain. Safely is highlighted by the makers as a selling point but while some users say they have experienced nothing more than a mild zap, others have reported minor burns.
The importance of this depends on whether it was due to a design error or misuse but the number of people successfully using it on facial hair suggests that its safety record is legitimate.
Another disadvantage to be aware of it that this is not a rechargeable device; the cartridges work until they die and need to be replaced and some users have complained that 1000 pulses is far too short a lifespan – even if the product does come with a free replacement.
Summary: is this Flash and Go Hair Removal product a good substitute for the professional treatments?
This system would probably be worth a few more marks if the cartridges lasted a bit longer, so the need for replacements did not work against the cost effective nature that makes it so attractive, and interested buyers should remember that the paler your skin and darker your hair the better the results.
Having said this, when it does work to its full potential, the Silk’n hair removal device is a highly recommendable alternative to other options because it seems to offer a great chance at hair reduction with the speed, safety and reliability that it claims.